Nir Soffer wrote: : : > It seems to me that a more correct fix would be, in the case of encrypt > passwords = no, to request a normal password and not a UNICODE one. Is > this even possible in the protocol? (e.g - request non-unicode passwords, > but still support non-unicode filenames?)
Unicode is either ON or OFF. If Unicode is negotiated, then the Windows clients will try to send a Unicode password. > This is definitely broken now if this the case, regardless where the bug > is... There are bugs in the Windows clients, clearly, but I think that we can work around them. I also think that smbclient needs to be tested in this regard. Chris -)----- PS. It would also be nice (hint to others on this list) if Ethereal were patched to read these messed-up packets correctly. :) -- Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, uninq. ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- [EMAIL PROTECTED]