In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, COLLOT Jean-Yves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Actually, the reason is not a performance one, but the "optimized" Samba > code does not correctly give the tm_isdst and the tm_gmtoff members of the > tm struct.
Now I need to find out if this is a VMS C RTL bug or a SAMBA bug, as there should not be a difference. The "optimized" SAMBA code is complex enough that I can not tell at a glance where the bug is actually at. Thanks. Jean-Yves, Can you set your mailer to not put a space the "RE" tag before the ":"? It should be the vendor's default setting. If the news/e-mail programs do not see "RE: " at the beginning of a subject line on a reply, they add one on each reply. And the news/e-mail clients/archivers also use the subject line to verify the thread context, and if they do not see that it is different only by a "Re:" or a "RE:", they assume that this is the start of a new thread, and not the continuation of one. It is causing confusion on tracking threads in the archive and the newsgroup. Thanks, -John [EMAIL PROTECTED] Personal Opinion Only PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT ETIQUETTE MESSAGE BEFORE POSTING: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
