On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Hanser, Kevin wrote: > I have been searching newsgroups and whatnot for over an hour trying to find > out a few things: > first, who maintains smbfs now..??
I do. The correct place to look for maintainer of a part of the linux kernel is the MAINTAINERS file in the kernel source (usually also installed by kernel-docs type packages). Google would have told you that as well ("smbfs maintainer"), except that Debian for reasons of unknown confusion have a package also named smbfs. > second, what can I do about this directory listing problem? > is this a known bug, and is there a fix? It's a previously reported problem (actually I think there have been more than one bug with this effect). But it's not know what is causing this and only some people are able to trigger it. > Here's a capture of some of the commands and what they're returning: > [root@blackpudding cp_live]# ls -l | wc -l > 1244 > [root@blackpudding cp_live]# ls -l | wc -l > 385 > [root@blackpudding cp_live]# ls -l | wc -l > 385 > [root@blackpudding cp_live]# ls -l | wc -l > 385 > [root@blackpudding cp_live]# ls -l | wc -l > 385 Are there any messages from the kernel after the first or second listings? (dmesg, look for smb* stuff). If not, could you take a tcpdump and send me/make it available for download. (tcpdump -w filename -s 1600 port 139) Btw, you haven't mentioned the samba and kernel versions you use. /Urban -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba