Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 05:22:06PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > Not sure. Optionitis striking again. But I think that the dynamic user adding > > upon session setup is a bad hack anyway. > > Or another idea: Add a %-Macro to tell the script which subsystem did it?
If people were paying attention when writing the scripts, nobody would get hurt. However... People (myslef included - and this is why 'add machine account' was written, despite jerry's objections) like the ability to just put the command in smb.conf, rather than calling a real script. In fact, 'add user script/add machine script' was my first attempt at this - but then JFM pointed out that _samr_create_user() creates users *and* machines. We ended back up where we started... In short: The extra % paramater will be unused, and the problem will continue. Andrew -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
