On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 09:17, Markus Schabel wrote: > John H Terpstra wrote: > > >On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, William Jojo wrote: > > > >>Just tought I'd follow up and see if 2.2.6 is truly the last release of > >>samba_2_2 CVS branch. > >> > >> > >Yes, 2.2.6 is the latest stable release. > > > So there will never be a stable samba again? ;) > Note the te in that word? Hopefully 3.X will be stable.
> >We hope that this will be our > >last update. All samba-team resources are now focussing on getting 3.0.0 > >readt for release. Right now 3.0.0 is still changing significantly and we > >would not recommend it's use in a production environment. > > Hooray! > >>We've got six systems running it with no visible issues. > >> > >> > >If it is not broken then why fix it? > > > the last version I had problems with was 2.2.3a (on a SuSE system) and > 2.2.4 (there were problems with LDAP, all solved since 2.2.5) > > >>I'm currently testing CVS from Sunday's pull of 3.0...is this the > >>direction I should be heading? > >> > >> > >Yes. But do your home work. Test, test, test, and give us feedback. > > > I'm currently working on a PDC for about 300 LDAP-based users, I guess > with LDAP there is no problem when migrating to 3.0? Probably I'll run > the actual CVS parallel.... > > regards > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba