On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 14:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 04:40:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Can Samba be used as a complete replacement for a Windows 2000 Active Directory 
>server? I have some vague notion that this can be accomplished by using a combination 
>of OpenLDAP, Samba, MIT Kerberos, and the OpenAFS file system. To say the least, the 
>descriptions I have found have been vague as to whether or not I will be able to 
>completely replace the functionality of an Active Directory server with a similar 
>setup.
> > 
> > If this is possible, could someone point me to reasonably good documentation on 
>the subject?
> > 
> > Thanks so much.
> > --David
> 
> >From the number of replies I received on this,(none) it seems fair to assume that 
>this is not entirely possible. Anyone able to tell me what the current limitations 
>are? I would really like to set up a system using samba as much as possible for 
>domain and file serving operations. I suppose I can supplement samba with a win2k 
>server if I have to... ;-)
samba can't serve active directory....

you might not really need it.

samba does work great as a PDC for large numbers of XP and NT/2k
workstations

brad

> 

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Reply via email to