On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 06:59, Jason Spence wrote: > On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 12:25:40PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > > Just a clarification: You can do IPC operations on disk shares, and some > > domain clients use ADMIN$ for the IPC part of the domain join. As Samba > > doesn't want to provide a 'disk' share that admins can't control, it > > maps it as an IPC share. > > If I taught samba how to deal with a ADMIN$ share which defined a > path = XXX while at the same time keeping the IPC functionality, would > that violate any assumptions other code has? You make it sound like > it might be a security risk too...
Not as far as I know - see param/loadparm.c for the function that adds ADMIN$ and IPC$ - you would just remove that 'add'. Hmm, you might even get away with defining admin$ as a share... Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
