-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 11.06.2009 22:12, schrieb Edward Ned Harvey: > (going from NT to AD server)
Hello, I saw some recommendations to use Microsoft's ADMT for this purpose. It isn't perfect and requires some cleanup afterwards, but it's doable. There is a testmode also, to see what's happening and se what has to be done afterwards or what's failing. ADMT and some informations: http://blogs.technet.com/askds/archive/2008/07/10/admt-3-1-released.aspx Cheers Matthias >>> Assuming you're using Kerberos, my expectation is that you don't >>> need to do >>> anything at all on the samba server. But don't hold me to it. >> How about if I'm not currently using Kerberos? > > What else is there? Samba is in "domain" security mode, right? I'm no > expert, but I think that implies Kerberos. And if I'm wrong, I think it > implies somehow using RPC in some form ... in which case I expect you to > have the same behavior either way. > > Point is, you're not using some funky ldap or whatever mechanism with any > weird schema. You haven't mentioned winbind, so I assume you're not using > it. My expectation is smooth sailing - on the samba side - not so much on > the NT side. ;-) > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAko0o6IACgkQf3LySRiTg2w4cACdGXf+Vqk9Qib0h84fut5W1wrr vUgAnjckFeqJs38OrY6YJp42LZGH/XnX =ENso -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba