On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 02:37:09PM +0300, David wrote: > Thanks for all your help and I'm sorry if I'm being a nag, but I have to > check all my options before moving on using nfsv4 authorization. > I quickly setup a test server with the same configuration like on my prod > environment, and I found that if remove gpfs module from the "vfs object" > option line, I can see the permissions and get the proper permissions from > the acls entries. (just like in example I sent at the begging) > > If this resolves my problem, is there a reason why not using this solution? > It also don't come up with what you wrote before which totally make sense to > me...
I never used GPFS with posix ACLs, and I *thought* from the mere existence of the special ACL API in gpfs.h that these calls are required. If it works fine now, perfect. Sorry for the noise, just ignore me. Volker
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
