On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:40:28AM +0100, Illtud Daniel wrote: > Jeremy Allison wrote: > >> It's doable, but I wouldn't use that syntax. I'd >> use an "allowed files = /XXX/" style. > > That's what I was thinking, but the question started > off as 'does veto files take !', so that's where my > convoluted syntax example came from. > >> Not been implemented yet.... Patch welcome :-). > > I've barely touched C since before I started using samba > (and that's 15 years ago...) but if you insist, I'll > cludge something together in a week that'll take somebody > else five minutes to completely rewrite... :)
Thanks -but at least you'll give me something to work on :-). > Any preference for precedence of 'allowed files' vs 'veto files'? > Or would you want an apache-style 'Order allowed veto' option? > (please say no). veto files should take precedence. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba