Hello, I have an interesting architecture consisting of a 3 RHEL 5.3 NFS nodes that mounts about 30 TB worth of iscsi disk and presents them as 6 different NFS shares. It is an active-active-active cluster with each node presenting a couple of shares. It works pretty well. I am doubting my decision to use NFS and am wondering if CIFS would be a better route. Here are the NFS stats:
getattr lookup access read write readdirplus 20% 16% 7% 44% 9% 1% Each NFS node pushes about 65 MB/s so they are pretty busy. It is a backup/recovery application so I would describe the I/O as lots of small reads/writes. Any thoughts? Thanks, Terry -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
