Volker Lendecke put forth on 1/25/2010 1:28 AM: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:14:36AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote: >> Volker Lendecke put forth on 1/24/2010 6:51 AM: >>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 02:09:51PM +0200, Michael Wood wrote: >>>> Except that he said "I can copy files between the Win2K and WinXP >>>> machines at just over 10MB/s in a single stream and max out the 11MB/s >>>> with two streams." I am assuming he used the same client in that test >>>> as he did with the test against Samba. So from what he's said it >>>> seems that he gets more speed with a Windows server than with Samba >>>> for the same client. >>> >>> So what we need is a full network trace of both cases. >> >> Actually I'll give you something slightly different, and more to the original >> question. I've taken two tcp captures on the Samba server machine. Both >> transfers were performed using the Windows 2000 cli "copy" command pulling a >> 36MB avi file from a share on the Samba server. The first test was a single >> stream copy. The second test was a dual stream copy of the same file >> concurrently to two different destination directories. I also had iftop >> running >> during the tests. The single stream transfer maxed out at just over 64Mb/s. >> The dual stream test maxed out at 92Mb/s. Following are the two tcpdump >> output >> files using "tcpdump -p -s 0 -w FILE port 445": >> >> http://www.hardwarefreak.com/smb_single_stream >> http://www.hardwarefreak.com/smb_dual_stream > > The dual-stream one is kindof limited help. The interesting > piece is how Win->Win does its thing faster, so we need to > see that one.
I think something is wrong. I downloaded Wireshark Win32. When running tshark -p -w smb-winwin-single-stream port 445 the transfer rate is half what it is without Wireshark running. What am I doing wrong? Thanks. -- Stan -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba