Hi,

   I've just been debugging something related to this. Environment is
samba 3.4.6 with LDAP backend and windows 7 clients. In my case the user
in passdb but getpwnam() fails led me to adjust /etc/ldap.conf so that
machine accounts were also listed as valid users on the system.

I don't really understand why this is required since ldapsam:trusted =
yes  in my case and I thought that parameter would bypass the getpwnam()
check.

No idea about the credentials failing, I'm just happy I can give domain
users privilege on the win7 machines ;-)

hope this helps,
Greg 


On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 13:58 +0000, graham wrote:
> Re. the ongoing failure of the windows7 client to authenticate its 
> machine account, I've upped the log level and added an extra debug 
> statement to getpwnam_alloc().
> 
> There are a couple of discrepancies which I very much hope someone can 
> explain, or at least point me in the direction of how to resolve!
> 
> 
> Comparing the output for a winXP client (successful) and the win7 client 
> (unsuccessful), it seems that:
> 
> 1 - the challenge-response mechanism is different for the win7 machine 
> to that of the winXp machine (and the win7 machine fails this 
> authentication).
> 
> Can anyone enlighten me as to why the different challenge, and why the 
> client might fail it?
> 
> This is the trace for the unsuccessful win7 machine:
> 
> [2010/02/05 22:55:10,  5] libsmb/credentials.c:70(creds_init_128)
>    creds_init_128
> [2010/02/05 22:55:10,  5] libsmb/credentials.c:71(creds_init_128)
>       clnt_chal_in: 444EA615F23340F2
> [2010/02/05 22:55:10,  5] libsmb/credentials.c:72(creds_init_128)
>       srv_chal_in : DE62C1B8DCC1E4AD
> [2010/02/05 22:55:10,  5] 
> libsmb/credentials.c:221(netlogon_creds_server_check)
>    netlogon_creds_server_check: challenge : 2818DBF48BE4EBC0
> [2010/02/05 22:55:10,  5] 
> libsmb/credentials.c:222(netlogon_creds_server_check)
>    calculated: EDC837F244BC1EBB
> [2010/02/05 22:55:10,  2] 
> libsmb/credentials.c:223(netlogon_creds_server_check)
>    netlogon_creds_server_check: credentials check failed.
> 
> This is the trace for the successful winXP machine:
> 
> [2010/02/05 23:06:44,  5] libsmb/credentials.c:121(creds_init_64)
>       clnt_chal_in: DF0D76C6D2BF3CDB
> [2010/02/05 23:06:44,  5] libsmb/credentials.c:122(creds_init_64)
>       srv_chal_in : EE4404370EE4219C
> [2010/02/05 23:06:44,  5] libsmb/credentials.c:123(creds_init_64)
>       clnt+srv : CD527AFDE0A35E77
> [2010/02/05 23:06:44,  5] libsmb/credentials.c:124(creds_init_64)
>       sess_key_out : 6D4885F56283E87B
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2 - later, (perhaps as some fallback authentication?) the get_pwnam() is 
> called a number of times for this machine account, initially it succeeds 
> then in a later call fails NOT because the machine account isn't in 
> /etc/passwd, but because it is looked up in UPPER case.
> 
> Is this a bug?
> 
> Here's the trace for the failure:
> 
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
>    pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
>    push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18,  3] smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx)
>    push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
>    setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18,  5] auth/token_util.c:522(debug_nt_user_token)
>    NT user token: (NULL)
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18,  5] auth/token_util.c:548(debug_unix_user_token)
>    UNIX token of user 0
>    Primary group is 0 and contains 0 supplementary groups
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18,  1] lib/util_pw.c:59(getpwnam_alloc)
>    my extra debug: sys_getpwnam(WIN7HOST$) failed
>                                 ^ *the name as passed to getpwnam_alloc*
> [2010/02/05 22:55:18,  1] auth/auth_util.c:577(make_server_info_sam)
>    User WIN7HOST$ in passdb, but getpwnam() fails!
> 
> 
> rgds,
> graham.
> 
> 

-- 
Greg Dickie
just a guy

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Reply via email to