Hi to all,

ist a little bit confusing for me. How are the steps I must do to update a 
working samba 12 ads with repl. partner (samba 4 12) to samba 13 alpha?

-----------------------------------------------
EDV Daniel Müller

Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076 Tübingen

Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499
eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de
Internet: www.tropenklinik.de
-----------------------------------------------
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im 
Auftrag von Andrew Bartlett
Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. September 2010 22:34
An: Jelmer Vernooij
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; Konstantin Pobudzey; samba-techni...@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] Upgrade to Alfa13

On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 12:58 -0700, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 20:47 +0200, Michael Wood wrote:
> > On 26 September 2010 04:21, Andrew Bartlett <abart...@samba.org> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 11:29 -0700, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > >> On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 18:54 +0200, Michael Wood wrote:
> > >> > On 22 September 2010 14:15, Konstantin Pobudzey <5836...@gmail.com> 
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > ( I'm using zipped package from 
> > >> > > ftp://us1.samba.org/pub/samba/samba4/ ) Also size is smaller 
> > >> > > then previous released . Is it should like this ? )
> > >> > I think the previous releases also contained the Samba 3 source 
> > >> > code, while the alpha 13 tarball does not.
> > >> They didn't contain the source3 directory either (at least 
> > >> alpha11 didn't). We no longer have big generated configure and 
> > >> Makefile's, I suspect that explains at least part of the reduction in 
> > >> size.
> > >
> > > We also don't have the generated PIDL output in the Samba4 tarball 
> > > (this will still be provided for Samba3 tarballs).  That is 
> > > probably responsible for more of the size difference.
> > 
> > In howto4.txt, the "Step 2bis: recompile Samba4" section says to run:
> > 
> >   $ cd samba4/source
> >   $ make clean
> >   $ ./autogen.sh
> >   $ ./configure
> >   $ make idl_full
> >   $ make
> > 
> > Is the "make idl_full" really necessary?  Also, with waf is the make 
> > clean still necessary?
> 
> That howto looks fairly outdated by now. Should we perhaps just import 
> the copy from the wiki into our source tree as part of the release 
> process?

Yeah - I guess that would be the safest way.  That way users needing to test an 
old version can still get a HOWTO at all, but we don't try and maintain it in 
two places...

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Reply via email to