Hi Daniel,
thank you very much for your fast answer!
you should try iscsi drbd gfs if you think and mix wisely it should
start. THis is, you have on central point of storage where all three nodes
write to and this storage backed up.
wouldn't I have one single point of failure then (in terms of HA) or did
I get something wrong?
My latest try with ctdb did not work on CentOs. The package was brocken.
Good to know, thanks, I'll compile it from source then as I also run
CentOS 5.5, wanted to use 3.5 anyway.
And I think it is not
possible to cluster a DC.
Could you elaborate more on this?
Do you mean it's not possible to cluster samba acting as a DC? If that's
what you're saying and it's true I must have missed the biggest point.
I'd like to set up 3 samba nodes clustered with CTDB, with each
node/machine having its own sets of local disks.
It would be great if 2 machines and/or sets of local disks could fail
the same time without taking down samba.
Is this only possible using DRBD as suggested in the current Samba 3
book?
The book by Volker Lendecke, Karolin Seeger, Björn Jacke and Michael Adam.
Maybe it's only available in German, I don't know.
Thank you,
Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
