On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:01:13AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > Sure, that would be a possible reason. But something looks > not right in your setup. After a failover, locking.tdb > should be empty. When smbd is started on node2 after the > failover is done, it will open the locking.tdb file with > CLEAR_IF_FIRST. This means, all entries which are by > definition empty are wiped out. Alternatively, if you are > running ctdb, then smbd should have either been able to send > the kill message to the other node, or the code should have > discovered that process 12924 is not around anymore and it > should have removed the conflicting entry from the > locking.tdb entry.
Can you give a few more details about your setup? Do you have ctdb running? Do you have "clustering=yes" set in your smb.conf? Thanks, Volker Lendecke -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba