In my case the performance was still bad. But use a normal windows client as domain member with a share where the access database is on. With 20 User there should be no problem. And this should be much faster than an old W2000.
----------------------------------------------- EDV Daniel Müller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 Tübingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de ----------------------------------------------- -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von compdoc Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Januar 2011 13:24 An: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: [Samba] MS Access I need to have a server built and ready to install by this weekend, and I'm trying to decide whether to use the customer's copy of Windows 2000 Server, or Ubuntu or Centos. I think Ubuntu would have a newer version of samba. The problem is, for this one server, about 20 users hammer MS Access databases all day, and samba seems to have had issues with Access in the past. Is that still the case? The old server is dying, and they own Windows 2000 Server so it won't cost them $$ to continue using the OS, but it cannot take advantage of newer hardware/technologies, so its slower. Thanks for any info... -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
