>>
Christian Ambach wrote
> 
>>>On 02/13/2012 06:08 PM, ejp wrote:
> 
>>> It no longer fails on my workstation ID:-) It says "not permitted to
>>> access
>>>this share (ep)". I'm missing permissions somewhere?
> 
>>>[ep]
>>>         comment = restricted access
>>>         path = /home/epluskwa
>>>         create mask = 0775
>>>         valid users = epluskwa,root
>>>         read only = no
> 
> 
>>You defined ep to only be accessible for epluskwa and root, but you 
>>connected as CITNET\ed pluskwa. This does not match and so access to the 
>>share is denied
> 
> I added "CITNET\Ed Pluskwa" to my share (ep) permissions and it worked!
> I'm able to mount the share now.
> 
>>> I also noticed in my nmbd.log that it was growing very quickly with the
>>> following messages:
>>> [...]
>>> [2012/02/13 11:48:43,  2] lib/interface.c:341(add_interface)
>>>    added interface en4 ip=159.3.99.56 bcast=159.3.99.191 netmask=
>>> [2012/02/13 11:48:43,  2] nmbd/nmbd.c:280(reload_interfaces)
>>>    Found new interface 159.3.99.56
>>> [2012/02/13 11:48:43,  0] lib/util_sock.c:664(open_socket_in)
>>>   bind failed on port 137 socket_addr = 159.3.99.191.
>>>   Error = Can't assign requested address
>>>
>>>Interface 159.3.99.191 is not a defined or valid addr for us. Where is
that
>>>coming from? Can't ping it and nslookup fails.
> 
>>159.3.99.191 is detected as broadcast address of en4 with 159.3.99.56.
>>Maybe the broadcast address is not correctly configured for the NIC?
>>Please check your network settings.
> 
>>Cheers,
>>Christian
> 
> I'm still receiving the errors above in my nmbd.log file. Here are the
> current interface settings:
> 
> # ifconfig -a
> en4:
> flags=1e080863,480<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,GROUPRT,64BIT,CHECKSUM_OFFLOAD(ACTIVE),CHAIN>
>         inet 159.3.99.56 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 159.3.99.255
>          tcp_sendspace 262144 tcp_recvspace 262144 rfc1323 1
> 
> It's not using the broadcast address defined, 159.3.99.255. Is it
> calculating the .191 addr somehow? Either way it's not using the right
> one. netmask= is not populated either. Perhaps a bug?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ed
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
> 


--
View this message in context: 
http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/Samba-3-6-0-0-w-AD-Support-on-AIX-6-1-Error-w-Authentication-tp4384264p4387332.html
Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Reply via email to