On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 11:39 +0200, steve wrote: > On 05/08/2012 10:19 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 08:45 +0200, steve wrote: > >> On 05/08/2012 06:24 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > >>> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 12:27 +0200, steve wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi > >>>> We don't use winbind either and we also use nslcd (what a superb piece > >>>> of kit). We simply store the rfc2307 attributes in the dn of the user or > >>>> group and have setup scripts to manipulate uses and groups in this way. > >>>> All I'm looking for is an altrernative to the file sever that ships with > >>>> S4 at the moment. I think the new fileserver will become stable soon. > >>>> Just looking at the possibilites for having something now rather than > >>>> wait. Franky on the same box is attractive. > >>> Steve, > >>> > >>> Attempting to run Franky at this point will give you more, not less > >>> pain. There isn't some magic solution that we are hiding from you. > >>> > >>> We are working to allow smbd to become the default file server in Samba > >>> 4.0, and have added the --use-s3fs option to provision to allow early > >>> adopters to test it for us. > >>> > >>> However, we do not recommend it at this stage, as in particular it fails > >>> to correctly set ACLs for group policy objects. > >> Hi Andrew > >> Please give us the smb.conf settings for s3fs. We can't continue with > >> the ntvfs server as it is so at least we can give it a go. > >> Cheers, > >> Steve > > I've added this information to the wiki, where I'll try and keep it > > correct: > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/s3fs#Starting_s3fs > > > > Andrew Bartlett > Hi Andrew > > No go:-( > > New git: Version 4.0.0alpha21-GIT-e8e5afd on Ubuntu 12.04 > provision --use-s3fs --realm=polop.site --domain=CACTUS > --adminpass=Pass@w0rd --server-role=dc > > get_nt_acl_no_snum: fset_nt_acl returned zero. > ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix ACLs, > s3fs is unworkable in this mode > > So tried: > ./configure.developer --with-acl-support > Still will not provision. > > We are using posix acls fine: > mount > /dev/sda1 on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro,acl,user_xattr) > > What have I done wrong?
This will only happen if you do not have the acl headers available at configure time. Install libacl-devel (or equivalent) and rebuild. I added exactly this check to ensure that you quickly find and fix this issue, rather than wasting time wondering 'why does this not work'. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba