On 06/21/2012 10:24 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
On 21/06/12 07:42, steve wrote:
On 06/21/2012 08:27 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 14:17 -0700, todd kman wrote:
Let's start from the top: - Is libacl-dev1 installed on your system?
** I think that should be:
libacl1-dev
Here is the fstab entry on a working 12.04:
UUID=f99d4f08-6123-4941-8ee2-a260d22ddce5 / ext4
errors=remount-ro,acl,user_xattr 0 1
HTH
Steve
Hmm, this is interesting, this is what I have in my /etc/fstab on
Ubuntu 12.04 server
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
# / was on /dev/sda1 during installation
UUID=63c10807-be9a-4aed-bf2f-fa52e53fc162 / ext4
errors=remount-ro 0 1
# /home was on /dev/sda6 during installation
UUID=3826e336-978b-43e6-b02f-83694b132ed3 /home ext4
defaults 0 2
cat /proc/mounts
Shows:
/dev/disk/by-uuid/63c10807-be9a-4aed-bf2f-fa52e53fc162 / ext4
rw,relatime,errors=remount-ro,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
/dev/sda6 /home ext4 rw,relatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered 0 0
This passes the acl test on
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO even though acl is not
mentioned (it is installed) and Samba4 from git compiles and installs ok.
Do I need to add acl to my /etc/fstab lines? user_xattr seems to be a
default setting.
Rowland
Hi Rowland
My Samba4 is installed at /usr/local/bin on the / partition of the disk
so I added acl,user_xattr to the / line in fstab and rebuilt with
libacl1-dev installed, having read a post on the Ubuntu forum. Before
this, I had the same s3fs error when provisioning.
/proc/mounts here gives the same output as yours so It looks as if the
acl parameter is not needed, but no harm in trying. Are you able to
reboot if you change fstab? If my memory server me correctly, remounting
didn't work.
Sorry can't be more positive.
Cheers,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
