Thanks for the quick response. So I guess if you wanted high availability, you would either have to implement a PDC/BDC solution with samba4 or use samba4 on top of a corosync/pacemaker cluster. Is this correct?
br, Quinn On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Gémes Géza <g...@kzsdabas.hu> wrote: > 2012-07-11 10:27 keltezéssel, Quinn Plattel írta: > > Question: Right now samba4 is great as in all-in-one solution (samba, >> kerberos, ldap, dns) into one service. >> Is it possible to split it up so that for example, I run openldap on one >> server, kerberos on another server, and then dns/samba on a third server? >> >> br, >> Quinn >> > Short answer: NO > Longer: Windows clients expect kerberos, ldap and samba rpc+filesharing > services on the same host, so if you need AD functionality you couldn't > separate them. They also expect a schema (the AD schema) which is > incompatible with OpenLDAP. > > Regards > > Geza > > -- Best regards/Med venlig hilsen, Quinn Plattel -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba