Horacio
I had a Samba4 (4.0.0beta2-GIT) installation in production, with 40
something workstations with WinXP, Vista y 7 and a couple servers with
windows 2008 and 2003 server. To this time it had worked pretty fine, i
only have some issues related with ACL, some of them more related with
mixed permissions on Linux filesystem. We use GPO to control some
windows features at workstation level and the WSUS policies it works as
expected. On your enviroment i think that should consider some kind
redundancy, maybe a slave DC.
German Molano
El 23/07/12 10:13, Horacio Lo Brutto escribió:
We're involved in a project that the requirements could be satisfied
with both samba3 and 4. Anyway I am testing what can be done with
Samba4 and after following the tutorial published in the official
wiki, I was able to create my test domain, and join WinXP and Win7
machines to it without a problem.
I still need to test the GPO functionality, and some other stuff, but
before continuing with that testing, I would like to as you, what do
you thing about using samba4 in a network with about 700 computers
(mixed between WinXP, Vista, 7 and 2000) and about the same amount of
users.
Will it be stable enough? can I 'trust' samba for such network?
Thanks a lot in advance!
--
Horacio Agustin Lo Brutto
horac...@issecurity.com.ar
Rondeau 2575 | Distrito Tecnológico | C.A.B.A – Argentina
Móvil: 54 9 11 6105 3898 | Tel. 54 11 4942 6877
www.issecurity.com.ar
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
