> 2012-08-17 17:31 keltezéssel, fe...@epepm.cupet.cu írta: >> Reading Whatsnew.txt in samba I understand that If I use s3fs, as it is >> set by default in the provision step, I won't be able to modify GPOs >> later, right? >> So I have a couple of questions: >> >> - What's the advantage of using s3fs over ntvfs in new installations? >> - If I'm planning to deploy a new Domain, probably needing to change >> GPOs >> later, should I select ntvfs??? >> >> Best regards, >> Felix >> > If you use s3fs, the only thing you may need to do (first test if it is > still necessary it was with the git version a week ago) is to give group > Domain Admins, full access to the sysvol share (and recursively all > subfolders) from a Windows domain member computer (loged in of course as > a member of the Domain Admins group). > The major problem with ntvfs is that it isn't actively developed anymore > and hasn't received those protocol dialect updates (smb2-3) which were > introduced in Vista and 7, and thus it may have compatibility problems > later (no known problem exist so far) > > Regards > > Geza Gemes > --
Thanks a lot for your answer! I'll give it a try to s3fs. Best regards, Felix. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
