On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 02:46:17PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:45:28PM +0000, Scott-Fleming, Ian wrote:
> > Is it a problem to share a folder via Samba that is actually an NFS import 
> > from another machine?
> > 
> > Looking at Samba documentation, it seems it shouldn't be.  But I find only 
> > this one reference to re-exporting an NFS import via Samba  (this is under 
> > "Samba 3.6 Features added/changed"):
> > 
> > http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_3.6_Features_added/changed#NFS_quota_backend_on_Linux
> > 
> > which says "A new nfs quota backend for Linux has been added that is based 
> > on the existing Solaris/FreeBSD implementation. This allows samba to 
> > communicate correct diskfree information for nfs imports that are 
> > re-exported as samba shares."
> > 
> > But googling the problem, I find numerous discussions, where most contain 
> > something along the lines of this:
> > 
> > http://serverfault.com/questions/68330/samba-sharing-an-nfs-mount-point
> > 
> > 
> > which says, "The Samba manual mentions that re-exporting a NFS mountpoint 
> > over Samba does not work correctly. NFS is not 100% POSIX compatible, so 
> > some things work differently than what Samba expects.  I.e. you should run 
> > Samba on the same server where you run the NFS service, exporting the local 
> > disks directly."
> > 
> > I also came across various folks claiming one needs to play with the timing 
> > parameters in smb.conf.
> > 
> > We're currently running Samba 3.5.10, under RHEL 6.2 (3.5.10 is the version 
> > currently supplied with RHEL 6.2).  Machine Q nfs-mounts machine M's data 
> > disks, and re-exports them via Samba for users to access.  We are 
> > experiencing problems with the NFS share occasionally becoming very slow 
> > (both for machine Q and the machines that mount them via Samba), and I'm 
> > wondering if the re-export is the problem.
> > 
> > Question 1:  When was samba re-export of NFS import considered stable?  
> > I.e., Do I need to update to 3.6 (move ahead of RHEL distribution) for this 
> > to be OK?
> > Question 2:  Can someone point me to more official Samba documentation on 
> > exporting?
> 
> Bottom line - it'll mostly work.
> 
> Caveat. Don't come complaining here when the locking doesn't work :-).

And -- when it suddenly becomes slow, the analysis why it is
so is more difficult than with a local file system.

Volker

-- 
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kont...@sernet.de
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Reply via email to