On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:38:01AM -0400, Qing Chang wrote: > > On 04/09/2012 4:03 PM, Volker Lendecke wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:59:25PM -0400, Qing Chang wrote: > >>If I understand right, as a STANDALONE server, Samba should only care > >>about finding and > >>authenticating againt a matching uid to Windows username on the samba > >>server (which > >>uses LDAP), and then using the uid and gid(s) to provide shared resources, > >>which is the > >>behavior observed with 3.0.14a, but not with 3.5.10-125.el6. > >> > >>In fact, SID never matters with 3.0.14a, I have populated all users with > >>the same SIDs and > >>3.0.14a has been serving shares for years. > >Well, Samba has moved on to put more emphasis on SIDs. If > >that does not match your requirements, you should better > >stick with 3.0.14a and find someone from > >http://samba.org/samba/support to maintain it for you. > so which is the highest version that does not require strict SID check?
The main switch came with 3.0.25. With best regards, Volker Lendecke -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kont...@sernet.de -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba