On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 10:50 +0200, Michael Wood wrote: > Hi > > On 1 February 2013 04:18, Andrew Bartlett <abart...@samba.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 07:45 +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > [...] > >> Andrew, I would like to avoid killing processes by not asking > >> for them to start. :) > >> Regards, Dewayne. > > > > Just start and stop 'samba' and ignore any other processes it may create > > as children, no matter what they may be named now and in the future. > > Currently those child processes are called 'samba' and 'smbd', but that > > may change. > > Well, adding "server services = -s3fs, -winbind" and commenting out > any share definitions seems to stop smbd from starting, but I have no > idea whether or not that will break anything.
Michael, I know you are trying to address Dewayne's requirements, but please do not suggest untested combinations of server services. I say this because users tend to try out these things without understanding them, and only come back later to get us to come back and diagnose the breakage. I will address Dewayne's specific requirements in another mail. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba