On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:42:31 +0200, TAKAHASHI Motonobu <mo...@monyo.com>
wrote:
From: vagy <v...@freemail.gr>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:08:57 +0200
Btw how did you examine it? Did you setup a test lab
that implements the setup as i described it?
- Setup 2 subnets connected via a router
- Setup 2 Samba box in each subnet, each smb.conf is like
-----
[global]
workgroup = SAMBAxx
domain master = yes
wins support = yes
remote browse sync = x.x.x.x
------
- x.x.x.x means the IP address of another peer.
- SAMBAxx means the unique workgroup name (for example SAMBA01 and
SAMBA02)
Then, each Samba box exchanges its browse list.
---
TAKAHASHI Motonobu <mo...@monyo.com> / @damemonyo
facebook.com/takahashi.motonobu
Hi Takahashi,
thats very interesting and is a fallback scenario in case
samba4WINS doesn't work. Maybe the need for a DMB comes
from the fact that you used two different workgroups?
What if workgroup=SAME in both smb.conf?
I used two different workgroups. One is SAMBA01, the other is SAMBA02.
If I use same workgroup name, then they should be recognized as a domain.
---
TAKAHASHI Motonobu <mo...@monyo.com> / @damemonyo
facebook.com/takahashi.motonobu
Hi Takahashi,
thanx for the efforts, i'll try it out and post back here.
Cheers,
- vagy
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
