Hello, Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 08:16:58AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett napsal(a): > On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 00:05 +0200, steve wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 23:50 +0300, Giedrius wrote: > > > 2013.06.02 16:16, Andrew Bartlett rašė: > > > > On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 11:52 +0200, steve wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 01:46 -0700, Gary Maurizi wrote: > > I think that DNS is still our weakest link and I'm really pleased to see > > the devs looking through the end user list occasionally. Until the > > internal DNS is ready, we're stuck with bind. Let's try and make it as > > painless as possible for ourselves. > > The only way we can really improve it (as far as I'm currently aware) is > to take the bind binary, and launch it with a custom config file inside > 'samba' like we do smbd, pointing only at our DNS zone, and with chroot > etc disabled. > > That should, in theory, get us most of the control we get with the > internal server. Someone needs to write the patches however, and it > would mean we gain yet another DNS mode (which may be more trouble than > it's worth - I don't know).
I don't like this way. I know it should be easier for installing/documenting but you have less choices in usage. To be honest I don't like LDAP+krb builtin into samba binary with several limitations. As I wrote I understand it's easier way but from my point of view it is the worse one. Please don't include bind into samba. You just waste time with it. I didn't follow the discussion about internal DNS in samba but it also needs a lot of resources which are missing somewhere else. New admins will have some troubles but they'll learn new things and also troubleshooting. Best regards, Luf -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
