On Fri, 2013-06-07 at 14:37 -0600, Ty! Boyack wrote: > Does anyone know if this is intentional, or a bug? I don't see any > references to others having the problem, so I'm wondering if I've missed > something in the transition to 4.0 that needs to be done.
It's a bit of both. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8935 That is, it wasn't anticipated that folks would use %S in this way, and the change avoids clients being able to consume memory as we re-interpret the service for each incoming name. Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba