I only would like to put into consideration that I corrupted my outlook.pst file and lost a lot of messages while I had outlook open and the client lost connection due to service maintenance on the linux server.
And the Inbox-Repair-Tool from Microsoft didnt do a good job at all to resume the information. kind regardez Florian Stahl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Brandon Mercer > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:58 PM > To: John H Terpstra > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vizitiu, Ciprian > Subject: Re: [Samba] Outlook .pst on a samba share; do or don't? > > > > > It's OK to put the .pst files in a user share, just remember that > > performance across the network is slower than to local hard disk. > > Are you serious? Hard disks are the slowest operating part of any > computer. Unless your workstations have the Ultra320 Raid setups that > your servers do I find that the performance is better when using the > samba share. Just my experience. > > > If you leave the .pst file in the desktop profile then the > whole profile > > has to be copied across the network into a local profile > cache, that can > > be VERY slow also. Here the greater slowdown is the time > taken to log onto > > and off the network. > > Brandon Mercer > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba