Miguel Manso wrote:

Hi there,

Quoting Kurt Pfeifle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

The "illegal" chars were the commas. It indicates that your
Linuxprinting.org
retrieved PPDs were not the current version. Current versions don't have
this
issue any more.



Check for yourself:

http://www.linuxprinting.org/ppd-o-matic.cgi?driver=hpijs&printer=HP-OfficeJet_5110&show=1

Bye,


I should have been more precise.


PPD-O-Matic previously used commans inside the field tagged be the "*ModelName"
keyword. My guess is that *this* was causing the problem with the Adobe driver.
This *is* fixed now.

The online PPD spec test at http://www.cups.org/testppd.php now has no complaints
with the PPD you refer to above.

Could you please re-check with the Adobe driver, if that on still has an issue
with a current HP-OfficeJet_5110.ppd from Linuxprinting.org? Could you please
report back and confirm or reject?

Thanks,
Kurt

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Reply via email to