-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Is NIS+ still a valid option for Samba authentication in 3.0? In | some of the 2001 mailing lists: .... | I am working on migrating to OpenLDAP, but I need something in | place in the meantime. Sending passwords in the clear is an | option, but we prefer not to rely on the NT domain for reliability | and security is a big factor in authenicating off the NT side.
only the NIS+ passdb module was removed. Clear text authenticiation will still function.
cheers, jerry ~ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ~ Hewlett-Packard ------------------------- http://www.hp.com ~ SAMBA Team ---------------------- http://www.samba.org ~ GnuPG Key ---- http://www.plainjoe.org/gpg_public.asc ~ "You can never go home again, Oatman, but I guess you can shop there." ~ --John Cusack - "Grosse Point Blank" (1997)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/kBmCIR7qMdg1EfYRAu7nAJ9PPu+QzPc5ibDErLhzJpSiB0uoNgCeKhfH /SrkuF2z32FQmyD+JVtj9Bw= =aQrA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
