[public] comment = Public Stuff path = /home/samba/pub nt acl support = yes public = yes admin users = douglas write list = douglas
I'm logged in to Win2000 as douglas. Through the security tab on Win2000 I add read and write permission to the top level share called public (but it's not really public) for "terry". I see terry in the list and everything seems to go OK in setting it. Then I log off and login as terry. Terry has no write access to the share. What takes precedence? The share definition in smb.conf or settings through the security tab in windows, which should be the ACL's. Does adding a user through the security tab effectively add another user to the "write list". If so, it isn't. What am I doing wrong?
Here are the linux permissions:
ls -ld /home/samba/pub
drwxrwxrwt 3 douglas douglas 4096 2003-10-20 22:18 /home/samba/pub
Here are the ACL's from linux getfacl -R --skip-base /home/samba/pub
getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names
# file: home/samba/pub
# owner: douglas
# group: douglas
user::rwx
user:terry:rwx
group::r-x
mask::rwx
other::rwx
default:user::rwx
default:user:terry:rwx <<<<< Shouldn't terry have rwx access according to this?
default:group::---
default:mask::rwx
default:other::---
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
