I understand that the smb protocol is not in any violation, what i was talking about was does setting up a samba box to authenticate windows users conflict with any laws, seeing as how you are now negating the requirement for a licensed windows server. I would love to get rid of our Win2k pdc but my manager is a little sketchy since we have been in the eyes of the BSA for some time now (another story).
Jason


Philip Edelbrock wrote:

SMB is a spec from IBM, if I remember right. M$ implements it (or a flavor of it anyway), but they don't 'own' it or have some proprietary closed hold on the standard. I.e., Samba is not reverse-engineered, if that's what you are thinking. It also can't be(?) used to circumvent copyright, which is what the DMCA is all about, right?

Be careful about posting stuff like this to the list. It's flame bait for sure. ;')

Take care.


Phil


Jason Adams wrote:

With all this DMCA crud, is samba a target for a IP case from MS

Jason Adams



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Reply via email to