On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 08:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > * a Samba server that is a member of a Windows domain should > > run winbindd to allocate IDs for users/groups in its own > > domain and trusted domains. > > > In my specific situation, the UNIX id's are set up first so they don't conflict with > legacy systems/GIDs/UIDs, NT user names match the UNIX user names and users maintain > their own UNIX and NT passwords separately ie. it's up to them to make them the > same. Is this specific situation, winbindd is going to do more harm than good, if I > understand correctly. Right? > > If it's only a member server then it would have to be getting its information from > the resource domain BDC and by the definition above this information is all wrong > (other than the username and password) so it would be pointless. Or am I missing > something? > > Where does PAM fit into this?
The PAM configuration files direct how authentication should be handled . Should it (application, login, etc...) authenticate of the local system or winbind.... etc.... -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
