* Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> menulis: > > 1. Machine has valid passwords (NT+LANMAN) in PWDUMP but only 1 > > NThash on rpc-Vampire, passwd is different. > > 2. Valid PWD, only NThash on VMP, but NTHASH in VMP is *same* as > > LANMANHASH in PWD. > > 3. No valid hash in PWD (only "****"), but has valid NTHASH in > > VMP. 4. Valid PWD, valid VMP and both are same. > > > > On rpc-vampire, from total of 638 machine, 448 are only having > > NTpassword hash entry. > > > > Is it ok for machine account to have only one hash? (i can not try > > it right now because the site is on another city). > > Only the NT password matters, except on 3.0.2 and 3.0.2a. Later CVS > fixed an issue where the NT password not being present caused a bug > (account would be marked disabled).
1. In which tools we trust the output? pwdump or rpc vampire? why the output is different? 2. Is this mean I can not use 3.0.2 or 3.0.2a if I don't have LANMAN hash? Note: this 'feature' is mark as 'bug' by jerry and has been fixed. Is it safe to have NT hash only on production? http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-March/082989.html 3. Thanks. > > Andrew Bartlett > --beast -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba