On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 04:26, Rafal Pietrak wrote: > Hi All, > > I was wondering if anyone have tried to build v3.0.4 on Debian unstable > (curently it's sid)? > > It failed for me, and I had to make changes to packages/Debian/debian/* to > have it go. It looks like the debian directory there comes from quite old > days and samba evolved to the point where not all of it curently apply. > > The main problem is, that two chunks of fhs.patch get rejected. > > In the patches I include here, those two chunks are removed from fhs.patch > (the new patch is thus included here), and 'currently applicable' versions > of those chunks are in fhs-rp1.patch. I've made this split to allow for > easier inspection. For distribution, those should probably be 'cat-ed' > togather again as fhs.patch replacement. > > I also had to change some debian control files to have the package build. > Those changes are in debian-files.patch, which SHOULD NOT be put into > debian/patches as the fhs*.patch should, but applied manually BEFORE > dpkg-buildpackage is run (by doing: patch -p0 ...).
You might need to do a build-depends before you try to build Samba. You might choose to get the deb-src package for 3.0.2a and transfer the Debian directory to the 3.0.4 source. This is a very quick workaround... do the proper editing for 3.0.4 and all things should build very well. They did for me. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at the playfield. -- Thane Walkup
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
