On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 21:32, ww m-pubsyssamba wrote: > I can't say I've tested this in any depth. Where multiple LDAP servers are listed as > the LDAP > backend is the behaviour of Samba that if it fails to contact the first listed > server it will > try the second and so on? If that's the case Samba should only ever try and update > the password > on a single LDAP server which would then replicate the change to any other master > and slave LDAP > servers in the environment. This should work pretty well no? Are my assumptions on > Samba correct?
My worry is if two independent client update to two independent, disconnected LDAP peers. This particularly applies when we are doing an atomic increment in LDAP, like we do in IDMAP, and like a good 'add user script' should do. Andrew Bartlett
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
