> The consensus seems to be XFS but I'm not sure how proven this filesystem is > (I know SGI have used it since Irix 6.5 but that's a different OS).
Been using it for years under Linux 2.4.x, and now 2.6.x, never had a lick of trouble. > I need quotas and would like acls, but most of all want a fast reliable > system. Sounds like XFS. > Reports indicate that ext2/3 is particularly slow, especially for long file > listings and many people Yep, also seems to get slower over time and just generally slower when it starts to get past 50% full. > complain have corruption issues with reiser (nut > maybe that's RedHat only). Reiserfs, ick! I'd want a raise before I used that, many horror stories. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
