This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good conscience suggest to someone. Not charming doesn't begin to describe the consequences that may occur.
Craig On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 03:36, rruegner wrote: > Hi, > i updated my systems with the killing method > rpm --nodeps --force > i know this is not charming but it worked with the suse packs since > samba 3.0 up to samba 3.04 > but i strongly recommend to test this first on a test system !!!! > Best Regards > > Hamish schrieb: > > Thanks for you help, I tried to update with rpm -Uvh and it found a lot > > of failed dependencies: liblber.so.199, libldap.so.199, libpopt.so.199 > > etc - did you have these same problems? > > > > rruegner wrote: > > > >> Hi, i have a big smb/ldap setup and running > >> with 3.04 but with kernel 2.4.21 suse 9 > >> and i had no Problems with updating it ( all the way up from version > >> 3.0-3.04) it worked all like charme as before, > >> but i recommend to use samba packs from ftp suse projects samba, or > >> self compiled....yesterday i looked there there where patched 3.04 > >> packs against the swat sec bug ,but no 3.05 > >> > >> I know problems with sernet suse samba packs after update relating to > >> cups > >> Regards > >> > >> Hamish schrieb: > >> > >>> Hello > >>> > >>> I am planning to upgrade our production samba server (3.0.3pre2-SuSE > >>> on SuSE 9.0, kernel 2.6.5-10) tonight to 3.0.5. Is there anything I > >>> should know about things breaking during this upgrade? I will just do > >>> it with `rpm -Uvh --repackage samba*` - I have tried this on a test > >>> server and it seems to work ok, but if anyone has some info that > >>> might be useful I would be grateful! > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> H > >> > >> > >> > >> -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba