Jerry and Sandeep - thank you for you thorough answers, I have
followed up inline below ....
thank you
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 06:32:37 -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Chris McKeever wrote:
> | I have gotten 'point-and-print' working, but there are
> | a couple small issues/questions I am trying to get my
> | grasp around:
> |
> | - rpcclient print-1201 -U root%secret -c 'enumdrivers'
> | this lists the drivers twice
>
> Twice? or once for 'Windows 4.0' and once for "Windows NT x86'?
>
Actually Twice:
[Windows NT x86]
Printer Driver Info 1:
Driver Name: [TOSHIBA e-STUDIO810 srs-PS3UC]
[Windows NT x86]
Printer Driver Info 1:
Driver Name: [TOSHIBA e-STUDIO810 srs-PS3UC]
This was mentioned in one other archive post:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=samba+enumdrivers++twice&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&newwindow=1&selm=1suSn-52l-7%40gated-at.bofh.it&rnum=1
> | - When adding drivers via the Windows APW, after
> | uploading the drivers and the APW closing - are you
> | supposed to CANCEL out of the printers property window? If
> | not, the printer on the server get renamed with how the driver
> | wants to name it
>
> The Windows client is renaming the printer. You can just
> rename it again.
>
makes sense
> | - When the above happens, I have only found the
> | ability to delete the printer from windows, I have'n't found
> | a rpcclient (or similar) to delete the printer
> | (ie addprinter opposite)
>
> There's not one currently i don't think.
>
I also realized that the cause of this new printer was a side-effect
of the renaming above, and after setting it back - everything is fine
- it didnt actually 'ADD' anything
> | - Lastly, what happens _if_ two separate print
> | drivers have a same file name? Everything gets tucked
> | into the same directory??
>
> The is a problem in the Windows printing design. Yes
> there could be naming collisions, but most responsible
> driver writers manage their namespace to avoid this.
>
those pikers!!
>>I am testing this with Windows 2000 - and noticed something rather
strange..after
>.>installing the printer for two different accounts, if I go int oone and
edit the
>.>preferences using an account with PRINT ADMIN priviledges, it actually
updates the
>.defaults on the other users preferences
> Changes made to the printing defaults (Advanced Tab) will be reflected
> on the other machines where the drivers have been downloaded. Changes
> made to the printing preferences will be local to that machine only.
if I understand correctly - which is also what I see happen - is that
when the changes are made to the ADVANCED TAB - it gets reflected even
on those machines that have previosuly downloaded and installed off
the server ---
The only reason I ask for clairifaction is that it seems
semi-contradictory to the HOWTO 'If you want all clients to have the
same defaults, you need to conduct these steps as 'printer admin'
before a client downloads the driver' --
> The settings stored on the Samba server will be reflected in
> "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows
> NT\CurrentVersion\Print\Providers\LanMan Print Services\Servers"
> This is what you see when you invoke the Advanced properties.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
