That being said if samba 4 does have it's own ldap "like" backend unless people are able to use it for other services I beleive that openldap will still be the back end of choice.
Robert
Alex Satrapa wrote:
On 27 Nov 2004, at 06:05, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I got lots of gray hair when I compared how hard it is to establish Samba + OpenLDAP, and then MS solutions, even with "official" documentation.
FWIW, I've just given a presentation to the local Linux Users' Group on this subject, based on notes made during my own installations. Until Samba 4 comes out (which includes its own "LDAP" style backend), we'll have to live with the nightmare that is Samba + OpenLDAP.
Once the notes are published, I'll notify this list too - then there can be another document for people to get confused by in addition to the material by Terpstra, IDEALX, et al ;)
Alex
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
