Samba 3.0.11, 3.0.14a, 3.0.15pre1 on Red Hat RHAS3 Samba server is an NT4 PDC (no ADS) passdb backend = ldapsam
I could try it out for myself, since I've a test machine besides my regular site. But I'd really rather have a definitive answer.
I have POSIX ACLs working fine.
In smb.conf I set "nt acl support = yes" (default anyway).
Let's presume that I go and put all sorts of "funny" directives for a given shaere into smb.conf. I.e., I put in smb.conf "force group = @domuser" or whatever I give a Unix file group setting.
I then contradict this with my ACLs from Windows by allowing full control to Everyone.
Which takes precedence, the ACLs or the smb.conf directives?
I mean, it's running like a dream anyway, but this was a question from one of my Windows admins.
Thanks!
--Tonni
--
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.billy.demon.nl
They'll love us, won't they? They feed us, don't they ? ... -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
