Steven French wrote:
Surprisingly NT4 still has a huge installed base, and cifs vfs did not support it reasonably well until version 1.30 of the cifs vfs (which is less than a year ago). Win9x/WinME has a large installed base as well, but is somewhat less important as a server, and would be fairly easy to support if I added the old "dos" style time conversion routines. I think it would take less than two weeks to do (add support for Win9x and WinME to cifs, a couple missing transact2 infolevels, and turning on the insecure lanman hash again), but is lower priority than Kerberos support.
I think the lack of Win9x/Me support is the biggest showstopper for a wide replacing of smbfs.
der tom -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
