Hi,
with internal dns servers ( master...slave) and the right wins entries
in smb.conf
you will have full function enabeled in all vpn nets.
Study wins browsing in the samba faqs and use the tap interface as its
written in the openfaqs
to make use of wins.
Regards
Rhys Goodwin schrieb:
Hey Guys,
Im also using openvpn. I would also recommend routed IP rather then
ethernet bridging for WAN use.
As far as routed subnets go, I was wondering, is it possible to drop WINS
and use DNS for name resolution and Would that be a prefered option?
Cheers,
Rhys
On 9/7/05, Thomas M. Skeren III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mike McMullen wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Over A Wan
I'm currently using OpenVPN to allow access to Samba over WAN. Works
pretty good but my experience has been that browsing shares and
directory structures over the WAN can be somewhat frustrating to
users. I believe this is b/c windows file sharing is a pretty heavy
protocal and our WAN connection is only 768bps up and down. You'll
also want to be using WINS for name resolution unless you're bridging
your OpenVPN subnet with your local subnet which I would avoid doing
if possible.
David
Hi David! Thank you for your feedback. Our connection is a T1. The
people
would be accessing a folder that has 3 folders in it with < 200 files
in each folder.
The connection would be their box to our box only. Would I still need
WINS
in this scenario?
Well you could map the drive by IP addy instead. I have 10 offices
connected by IPSEC encapsulated VLan. Users access the resources on the
various drives on various servers over the vlan. Sure it can be a bit
sluggish, but it's not horrible.
I'm not up on Windows requirements.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
