-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dragan Krnic a écrit :
>>>>> I might have unwittingly made the impression that the >>>>> problem only came with 3.0.20. The same problem was present >>>>> in 3.0.14 as well as 3.0.4. It's a very intermittent >>>>> problem which has been haunting me for months now. >>>> >>>> Then it's not this particular bug. >>> >>> No, it ain't. There's a dangling *.ldb file there write now. >>> But now there are 2 PIDs listed as holding the *.MDB file open >>> with "DENY_DOS" and "RDWR" sharing both with the same timestamp >>> "Fri Oct 14 19:58:09 2005", whereas formerly it used to be only >>> one open of *.mdb and one of *.ldb file. The *.ldb file was >>> opened "RDONLY" about 10 minutes earlier by one of the 2 >>> contestants. Can I do some more forensic on the logs? >> >> Ok, if you can reproduce this bug with 3.0.20b then refresh me >> with the problem and then let's look at it closer. > > > Yes. Of course. I've just compiled and installed 3.0.20b and set a > watchdog to observe it. > > I was thinking of adding a repair action to the watchdog script > that would identify the smbd PID keeping the *.ldb MS Access DB > lock file open for so long and kill it, but the command "net rpc > file" never lists what I can easily see on the status page of SWAT > if I continuously refresh it until by chance one of the clients > opens it. The "net rpc file > > only lists "0 \PIPE\samr 0x35 0 dummy user > > all the time. Is there another CLI utility which lists the same > thing as SWAT does? > > Regards Dragan > > PS.: I've severely edited the verbosity of a samba log for the > previous incident, so that the MS Access rain-dance can easily be > followed to the point where the offending client for some reason > reopens the lock file after once successfully opening it with > numopen=1, meaning that nobody else claims it until he reopens it, > when numopen increments to =2 for obvious readons, and then never > remembers to close it the same number of times. It might be one of > those MS tricks to scare the users off Samba? > > Would you like to take a look at it, if I send it to you > off-samba-list? > smbstatus list all connection and open file - -- Stéphane Purnelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Site Web : http://www.linuxplusvalue.be -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDUN428tswkE3d0ecRAsQYAJ0TaShcH/nSt6QYS70ePxFRvmRlNwCeJ8hV nROnK0ZPy5fQ/q7H+Dsnvw8= =J8Gu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba