-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matt Johnson wrote: > On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Fermin Molina wrote: >> >>> I don't know exactly, but when I moved the information >>> from NFS servers to local storage, the problems disappeared. >> >> >> Samba assumes posix locking semantics on the filesystem. >> NFS locking is broken. You might try setting >> 'strict locking = no'. If that doesn't work, you might >> try 'posix locking = no' just as a test. > > We'll give that a shot -- we're still doing fs->nfs->samba > sharing. Is this going to incur a slowdown?
No. But if you are accessing the same file via NFS and CIFS, you might have problems with applications not recognizing each others locks. jerry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEBcBrIR7qMdg1EfYRAkzqAKCGja38B0JCpPTkGkucACyZebsiJQCgunBN 5UFAkiYNpLIRYq8RBcoKN8A= =guFx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
