Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: > Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >>> I guess I must be getting ldapsam confused with some other variety of >>> ldapsam then? That's the only one I know of that I currently use >>> (however, it is because of a plan to MOVE to LDAP, not because we're >>> currently using it). > > --with-ldapsam is only the 2.2 backwards compatible option > and is used to implement the ldap server and ldap port > parameters. It has no direct effect on 'passdb backend = ldapsam' > > In smb.conf you will still be able to configure 'passdb > backend = ldapsam_compat:ldap://localhost' if you need to > the older 2.2 compatible schema (although I would like to > remove that option at some point as well.
Thanks for the clarification. In that case, I personally don't see any reason it needs to stay (and am pulling it from my next build testing). -- ---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III |$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/AST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba