Ah....sorry for the last note I meant 3.0.23 NOT 2.0.23
========================================== M. D. Parker Systems Administrator General Atomics / Electromagnetic Systems +1 858 455 2877 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: M. D. Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 4:07 PM To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' Subject: Problem using 3.0.23 client in a domain with a Samba 3.0.20c PDC. Importance: High I have a samba PDC running 3.0.20c I installed Samba 3.0.23 on a client joined to the domain. With this combination, when I attempt to connect to a share on this client from any host even the localhost results in the following: $ smbclient //localhost/atest -U auser Password: Domain=[DOMAIN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23-SerNet-RedHat] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED Windows clients will similarly NOT connect. This situation does not happen on other NON-3.0.23 clients containing shares. I have traced the problem to the line in the smb.conf file that I have been using for years: [atest] . . "valid users = auser" . . If I remove this line, I get connected to the share, however, of course I lose any username protection. I have tried using write list = or even admin users = ... All to no avail. The log file indicates seems to recoginze my id but then finally at the end gets some type of deny message: [2006/07/11 15:38:34, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324) Allowed connection from (127.0.0.1) [2006/07/11 15:39:37, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(309) check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [auser] -> [auser] -> [auser] succeeded [2006/07/11 15:39:37, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324) Allowed connection from (10.10.32.200) [2006/07/11 15:39:37, 2] lib/access.c:check_access(324) Allowed connection from (10.10.32.200) [2006/07/11 15:39:37, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(571) user 'auser' (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (atest) I have had this problem on all the "RC" versions of 3.0.23 and thought that this was something that would probably be fixed at release time. Wrong assumption. Got a fix or a workaround for this problem? I really need this to work before being able to upgrade to this revision. ========================================== M. D. Parker Systems Administrator General Atomics / Electromagnetic Systems +1 858 455 2877 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba