-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael Schurter wrote: > On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 12:34 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: >>> Charles, This is a known issue at the moment. If we did >>> a limited amount of nested group expansion (one level for >>> example, would that be ok)? >> For our deployment usecase, we'd need an absolute minimum of 3 levels of >> expansion, depending on the definition of level. For us we have: > > Could the level of recursion be a configuration parameter and just > default to 0? That would seem ideal as it would keep backwards > compatibility and offer the greatest level of control.
Possibility. Myself and another dev here at Centeris are looking into this. cheers, jerry ===================================================================== Samba ------- http://www.samba.org Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com "What man is a man who does not make the world better?" --Balian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFVOo2IR7qMdg1EfYRAhpJAKDCKIWTU/zSUE+SP3I0kG/KnOx/CwCgwDpw hpFrEdW5QSryeiCmSXhEGUM= =DfA9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba